Summary: Amotivation and anhedonia, rather than expressive dysfunction, are crucial to determining the social functioning of individuals with schizophrenia. The transdiagnostic network analysis examined the relationship between negative symptoms, other psychopathologies, and social functioning in patients with schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder.
They found that amotivation and anhedonia were strongly related to social functioning across all disorders, though the relationship varied among the disorders. The study suggests a need for targeted interventions addressing these symptoms to improve social functioning in these patient groups.
- The study showed that amotivation and anhedonia play a crucial role in determining social functioning across schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder.
- The impact of these two factors on social functioning varies among the three clinical groups, indicating the need for more specific interventions.
- The research suggests that the amotivation and anhedonia factor could be a potential target for interventions aimed at improving social functioning in these disorders.
Source: Chinese Academy of Science
Dr. Raymond Chan’s team from the Institute of Psychology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and his collaborators have recently shown that amotivation and anhedonia, rather than expressive dysfunction, play a crucial role in determining the social functioning of schizophrenia patients.
The study was published in Nature Mental Health.
Negative symptoms refer to the loss of normal functioning, including anhedonia, avolition, alogia, asociality, and affective blunting, and have been shown to be the most important predictors of ultimate quality of life and functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
Traditionally, negative symptoms have been seen as specific to schizophrenia spectrum disorders. However, recent evidence suggests that negative symptoms may be shared by other psychiatric disorders, such as major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.
Therefore, it is of clinical and theoretical interest to know whether amotivation and anhedonia, rather than expressive dysfunction, would have a similar impact on social functioning in a transdiagnostic sample.
To address such a knowledge gap, Dr. Raymond Chan’s team and his collaborators conducted a transdiagnostic network analysis to specifically examine the network structure and interrelationship between negative symptoms, other psychopathologies and social functioning in 195 patients with schizophrenia, 92 patients with major depressive disorder, and 67 patients with bipolar disorder.
They assessed all the patients using two different tools. The Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale were used to evaluate symptoms and the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale were used to evaluate social functioning.
According to Dr. Chan, the amotivation and anhedonia factor played a central role in the transdiagnostic network at both symptom domain and symptom item levels.
In particular, the amotivation and anhedonia factor, rather than the expression factor, was strongly related to social functioning and made a greater contribution to social functioning in the entire sample.
However, a subsequent analysis revealed a different, interesting pattern among these relationships in major depressive disorder.
Both the amotivation and anhedonia factor and the expression factor contributed equally well to the observed social functioning in patients with major depressive disorder, whereas the amotivation and anhedonia factor contributed most to the social functioning behaviour observed both in patients with schizophrenia and with bipolar disorder.
This finding suggests that the impact on social functioning of these two domains of negative symptoms, i.e., the amotivation and anhedonia factor, and the expression factor, may differ among these three clinical groups. Therefore, a more specific and targeted intervention for social functioning is needed for these clinical groups.
Taken together, this study shows that the amotivation and anhedonia factor is strongly related to social functioning and accounts for a larger proportion of the variance in social functioning among a transdiagnostic sample of individuals with psychiatric disorders.
Based on these results, the amotivation and anhedonia factor may be a potential intervention target for alleviating clinical symptoms and improving social functioning in schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder.
About this schizophrenia research news
Original Research: Closed access.
“A transdiagnostic network analysis of motivation and pleasure, expressivity and social functioning” by Raymond Chan et al. Nature Mental Health
A transdiagnostic network analysis of motivation and pleasure, expressivity and social functioning
Negative symptoms, comprising the motivation and pleasure (MAP) factor and the expressivity (EXP) factor, are key determinants of social functioning in schizophrenia (SCZ).
Although negative symptoms are also found in major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD), it remains unclear whether the two factors would have different impacts on social functioning from a transdiagnostic perspective.
Here we adopt network analysis to examine the inter-relationship pattern between the MAP and EXP factors, social functioning and other clinical characteristics in 192 patients with SCZ, 67 patients with BD and 92 patients with MDD.
The results show that the MAP factor is the central node in the transdiagnostic network at symptom-domain and symptom-item levels. The MAP factor is closely connected to social functioning and makes a greater contribution to the variance explained for social functioning.
These findings support that the MAP factor is the core symptom in determining social functioning across different psychiatric disorders.